The Charge to Expanded Tutoring
October 01, 2025
How two districts customized high-dosage instructional support for students with the greatest post-pandemic learning needs

On a gray December afternoon in 2024, as Gloria Hatfield walked to her car in the Western Guilford Middle School parking lot, an 8th-grade boy approached her to ask, “Can you help me with a math problem?” In that moment, Hatfield recognized her work as a tutor meant something special. “I know the kids know I am someone who can help them,” the retired teacher shared.
Hatfield was one of 189 tutors working in Guilford County Schools during the 2024-25 school year. Serving just over 66,000 students in the greater Greensboro, N.C., area, Guilford County was one of the first districts to make a significant commitment to high-impact tutoring early in the pandemic and continues in that commitment today.
While tutoring has been an educational tool for centuries, high-impact tutoring emerged in the wake of the pandemic as districts’ most common response to learning loss. Defined by a rapidly growing evidence base, high-impact tutoring is small-group tutoring with no more than four students working with a consistent tutor for at least 30 minutes at a time, at least three days a week.
Based on the U.S. Department of Education’s School Pulse Panel data, as much as 80 percent of all districts offered some type of tutoring in the immediate post-pandemic years. In 2022-23, 37 percent of public schools in the United States reported providing specifically high-dosage tutoring. By May 2024, according to the School Pulse Panel, that number had grown to 46 percent, and just 13 percent of schools said they offered no tutoring at all.
This Content is Exclusive to Members
Âܲ·AVĘÓƵMember? Login to Access the Full Resource
Not a Member? Join Now | Learn More About Membership
A Tutoring Alternative: Investing First in Tier One Instruction

By Kyle Barrentine
As superintendent of a small, high-performing rural school district in Indiana, I recently attended an instructional conference where 40 exhibitors were hawking products to the attending educators.
What shocked me was that 18 of the 40 vendors were selling tutoring services. These vendors were finding a business opportunity in a system that’s built backward. Their services are the symptom, not the cure. If we funneled education dollars toward better supporting teachers and helping students at the front end of their education, tutoring wouldn’t be needed.
That’s why Tier One instruction, sometimes referred to as universal or first-time support, is a priority among our teachers and students at Shenandoah School Corp. It focuses on learning strategies that lay the foundation for every learner. We believe strong initial instruction is crucial for student success and reduces the need for later educational interventions.
We’ve seen the results. Shenandoah’s students outperform the state average on standardized tests. Among Indiana’s 389 school districts, Shenandoah has jumped 55 spots in two years to rank 67th in the percentage of students passing both the language arts and math sections of our statewide assessment in grades three through eight.
Our Five Promises
Shenandoah grapples with the same trends facing schools nationwide — declines in student-age population, teacher shortages, competition from home-schoolers and private options. In that context, supporting Tier One instruction has yielded results.
This is how we approach it.
Articulate a written curriculum. A well-defined curriculum, outlining what is taught and when it’s taught, is essential. This is the solid foundation for our instructional home. Does this creep into the realm of micromanaging teachers, who value autonomy and trust in their professional abilities? I believe not.
Innovative teachers understand that boundaries foster creativity. Such a system creates benchmarks and generates data teachers can rigorously apply toward evaluating student progress.
Foster strong building leaders. Certainly, our administrators must have strong operational skills, but we also must emphasize their role as instructional experts by making them partners to their teachers, guiding and supporting their professional growth.
This doesn’t mean principals become micromanagers. It means collaborating on professional development that focuses on instructional practices, partnering on data analysis and providing consistent feedback based on classroom observation.
Focus on rigorous teacher selection. Teachers are the most important school factor in how much students learn. And yes, it’s challenging work. The teacher shortage is real. We resist the urge to settle.
Building leaders who prioritize instructional excellence should apply that same rigor to the hiring process. This involves carefully evaluating candidates’ teaching skills, content knowledge and commitment to continuous learning.
Provide a comprehensive teacher support system within the school day. Instead of periodic early releases, we adjusted school schedules to embed consistent, high-quality training for teachers into the school day. We helped parents and teachers understand how this provided consistency and equipped teachers to immediately implement effective teaching strategies.
In addition, we provide differentiated support to teachers who are new to our school district through monthly meetings focused on instructional best practices.
Provide opportunities for teacher collaboration. This builds on the earlier promises but bears emphasis. Tier One instruction demands educators establish a common language around instruction. That ensures consistency and understanding across grade levels and subjects.
By giving teachers space to analyze student work collaboratively, they gain insights into student learning, identify areas where instruction needs to be adjusted and develop a shared understanding of what successful learning looks like.
A Core Focus
Reflecting on my advocacy for Tier One instruction, I recalled my days as a basketball coach running the “flex offense,” an old-school strategy from the 1970s. My friend reassured me, “Every year, I see a lot of people scoring using that offense.”
My point is this: I stand by my belief in programs that foster critical thinking, emphasize job preparation and support apprenticeships and work-based learning. Innovative programs can benefit students.
You can’t critically think about a topic if you don’t know anything about it. Job preparation can’t happen effectively alongside remedial basic education. Focusing on the core components of quality teaching and learning yields positive results and makes everything else possible.
Kyle Barrentine, who retired this summer as superintendent of Shenandoah School Corp., is lead consultant with 5296 Consulting in Middletown, Ind.
After-School Tutoring’s Parental Buy-in
To reach as many students as possible, high-impact tutoring leaders and advocates focused on tutoring within the school day. But some school districts are finding success with after-school high-impact tutoring programs.
“Before the pandemic, there was so much activity in the after-school hours,” says Joseph Talarico, an English teacher and head of high-impact tutoring at the Columbia Heights Education Center, a neighborhood school serving grades 6-12 in the District of Columbia Public Schools. “Now it’s 3:50 p.m., and it’s just empty.”
Talarico has led his school’s efforts to fill that void with an after-school high-impact tutoring program. Last year, 161 students participated in the program, receiving at least 90 minutes of tutoring weekly.
The program’s success has led to additional funding from DCPS to double the number of students served in the 2025-26 school year. At a school where more than 40 percent of students are English language learners, the after-school program is yielding dividends in both math and English achievement.
“We saw that beyond tutoring, students started asking their tutors for help with college applications, scholarship programs or reviewing their resume,” Talarico shares.
Tutor Relationships
To succeed, after-school tutoring programs need explicit buy-in from parents. Talarico’s team found that middle school parents were particularly willing to commit to their students’ participation after school. Teachers serve as the after-school tutors, and CHEC ensures that students are assigned to a tutor with whom they’ve previously had a relationship. This helps cement student engagement in the tutoring program.
In Northern California’s Milpitas Unified School District, Priti Johari, executive director of learning and innovation, considers after-school tutoring with students in grades TK-6 an important factor in instructional success. Almost half the students who participated in the 2024-25 school year gained at least a year’s learning in math or English, with others typically gaining at least several months of learning in either subject.
“We wanted students to feel like the learning was applicable to what they were doing in class, so it wasn’t this extra thing they were doing,” Johari says. “This is a 2:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. after-care program and we built in 30 minutes of tutoring.”
Just over 10 percent of Milpitas’ elementary students received tutoring in the last school year, and Johari expects similar numbers in 2025-26.
While Milpitas uses outside tutors in its program, Johari attributes its success to teachers, tutors and district leadership feeling “we’re all much more interconnected in what we want as an outcome.” This level of connection stems from Milpitas’ use of outcomes-based contracts with the tutoring providers and from establishing feedback loops, such as ensuring after-school staff communicate weekly with classroom teachers on their students’ tutoring progress.
Time remains a coveted resource in education. Intentional and strategic after-school high-impact tutoring programs shouldn’t be overlooked.
— Liz Cohen
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement